Last
news
about the real structure of the Solar System.
(The new version that
completes "A different interpretation
for
the atomic structure"
http://perso.wanadoo.es/30127/Welookforsolutiontoproblem.html )
(Please forgive my faulty
English)
One assumes the man to be sufficient to its governs, or of to govern others, must really
know about
the world that surrounds him.
Really only are waves which we see.
Recent
scientific findings show an effort, it appears that half mankind, at
least,
must rely on a prodigious future. Some are: The prolongation life, the
visit
towards other planets, the teleportation, the human transplants, the future power of the qubits,
of
the robots, the mobile fantastic ones or genetically modified organisms.
An innumerable quantity of experts
(doctors,
teachers, engineers, researchers and technicians) for spent years'
working to
provide with new means to humanity. Fabulous investment, and government
grants,
corporate and private rely on it.
While, simultaneously, other alleged
half
mankind seems to indicate that we are fooling and deluding ourselves. Us providing dreams, when most needed alarm
sufficient to
realize the gravity of the global situation for achieves a state of
universal
cooperation. The man developed a battle against nature. The enemy, we
have it
at home.
Stephen William Hawking, said
declarations
of
The serious threats
facing
us is that we are placing on the brink of a second nuclear age
and
unprecedented climate change. He added that the future of the human
race at the
space. However, if we are not misinformed, a final catastrophe on Earth, is not apart from other close planets.
Why? We will
extend later.
Drawing
on his mood he even added: "Primitive life is very common”.
"And intelligent life is very poor.".
"Some would say that this still does not exist on Earth.".
As a good lady Assumption, dedicated to
cleaning houses, "the world created by man today is a big lie.".
But the world being created by Nature is
a
great truth, the crash is inevitable.
Here says: Global crisis 'to strike by
2030', By Christine McGourty. Science
correspondent, BBC News.
That happens with the use of reason and
the
common sense?
The discovery on the real structure of
the
Solar System could be the history of child attending, in war of
He was refugee three years. He had to
learn
very quickly that every man has in his mind some different decisive
information. The innate information and the successive experience, they
were
marking inevitably. He looked rocks, minerals, insects and fossils. It
surrounded
itself with books, many books. Verifying how from different educational
origins, centres, decrees or countries, different knowledge was given
for the
science or the history, with different explanations between European
west and
the
Why did not universities have matter of
common sense? In view as philosophy, was ignoring the definite common
sense. In
the atom, particles or waves can be simultaneous to an infinite speed,
and a
speed constant. In physics, particles or waves can be simultaneous to
an
infinite speed, and a speed constant. If the simultaneity of the
opposite waves
required infinite speed, it would be better to call it an infinite
symmetry, he
was thinking. The bodies are of limited dimensions, not must
represented by the
constant structures, of the electromagnetic fields. Etc. These
elementary
questions were not explained to his common sense by the universities.
Later
decided to resign the University understanding would make him a victim
of some
information predetermined. He managed to live more than 50 years, among
hundreds of thousands of books. He learned to simulate his life, while
looking
for answers.
That child, today, is an old man with
ailments. He has a little time.
He here describes his confession: Allow
I
use the colloquial expression. This way I will elude the forms of
bundle and
attainable questions now across the internet. Though
some
incorrectness will slide. Today, the illusion of progress, and
the technology,
they occupy the time and the minds. We need to return to certain
reflections.
Already it is difficult to find many men speaking with the common
sense,
remember the epoch of the Greek thinkers.
We know that an origin of the universe
must
exist with an initial
unstoppable explosion, called Big Bang. Today is converted into a
permanent
energy, transformable, which can not be created nor destroyed. Energy
can
appear in only momentum, acceleration, work,
mass and
forms mixed or combined in overwhelming complexities.
The Big Bang, besides initial impulse,
with
other arguments is the reason for the broken symmetry that deserved the
Nobel
Prize of physics 2008. Total stability coincides with the maximum
symmetry
without action. Without the broken symmetry there it is deduced that
our
universe would not have been perceptible. We are living through
balances of
circumstantial or perishable stability. Nothing of the origin is equal
to a
base of zero. A stability total of movement zero.
Nothing of Nothing doesn't create. Then,
the physics of zero broken, needs to support effects against effects',
equivalent zero. Matter and antimatter,
electron and
positron, etc. Each particle, has a
distinct
antiparticle, in this way. The need of a
substitute for
balance zero, so shows.
This way, we must see her, as an
uncontrollable initiative, also transformable, in permanent worry, in
the man.
Nevertheless, we are thinking about knowing that if to the beginning,
broken
symmetry could accompany with an uncontrolled movement, later, it
stopped
acting without control. This way, from the same origin of the tidy
evolution,
supposing some moment of original chaos immediately to the Big Bang, a
hierarchy begins from the simplest thing to obtain the order of the
formation of
the first atoms.
The
photons appear.
The photon and the maximum symmetry,
they
form a part of the fundamental laws of the order of the basic nature.
The
photon in addition of a fundamental particle, is also to reason all the
forms
of electromagnetic radiation. If after thirteen billion years, the
nature shows
culture of symmetry in new beings and the least action, it is due to
supporting
a hierarchy of the origin.
The lady Asunción,
has just corrected in the wall a picture, that scarcely was sloping.
The hierarchy of the principle of the
least
action it implies first use of the simplest thing, before other
complexity. So,
the repeat of basic copies is remarkable along the evolutionary
processes.
Let's trust now use of reason.
Now, the ideal continuation would have
to
continue where the Greek thinkers finished.
It is surprising that the current
science by
means of costly and complex procedures comes now to discoveries that
already
were deductions of the Greek sages. Pythagoras, Heraclitus
and Plato, manage good, with uses of reason
only. Then
the use of reason the physical sensibility was. The simplicity
fundamental, in
the geometry, it is to deduce the order of attributions, properties or
ready
dimensions, successively. The Pythagorean ones were calling physics
sensitive
to an association of the physics, use of reason and common sense.
For
Heráclito, the dark one, 500 B.C.:
“Is
the reality a continuous change, everything flows, nothing remains. All
reality
is the ceaseless change of a single principle: the fire (as the source
of
initial energy). Gases arising from it which then condense into liquids
and
residues to evaporate, solids arise. The universe is fire in different
states.
To the only thing to what we could call "god" in certain sense is to
the fire. But having clearly that the fire is not
good nor
bad, nor distinguishes between good and evil We call well, to be
convenient for
us to call well. There can be no day without night, wealth without
poverty,
life without death. The change of something in his contrary is an
inevitable
need. The wise man must understand the need for the existence of
opposites, and
resigned to the pain, poverty and disease as necessary complements of
pleasure,
wealth or health.”
And
they were calling him Heráclitous,
the dark one!
Eratóstenes
determined the Radius of the Earth three century's B.C.
Pitágoras
and the
Pythagorean ones introduced the physical measurements as the weight and
the
table of multiplying. They created the musical theory.
The
circular movement has a sound. A body or
a circular planet, moved, produce his typical sound.
Pitágoras called to
this sound the "harmony of the spheres".
Were
the first ones, in affirming that the land had spherical form and the
Sun and
the rest of planets were, not in the centre of the universe, but they
were
turning about a force. 1500
years
before Galileo and more than 2000 years before possessing the resources
for
their demonstration.
The mechanics, among the circuits of the
cerebral cells, which distinguish the man of the animals, they provide
a
process of deduction, so called the uses of reason. The Nature has the
norm of
realizing memorized actions. Some known neurological mechanics is to
observe
that the sequences connecting neurons are the registration of order of
an
event. The sequences that do not repeat themselves disappear. Under
this logic,
we understand as common sense, the memory of verification decisions
repeated
with the simplest norms of the Nature. We know of some reasons for
another
interesting work that can imply to the common sense born directly in
the
genetic experience. The principle of minimum action, with the highest
symmetry
of balance, the common sense is indirectly laws inspire. So we mean
common
sense, the finding and verification of the simplest laws of nature.
With the discovery of broken symmetry We know that we have come to the origin of the
known
universe. But the broken symmetry could not come only.
Before continuing, we need that the
reader
conceives the decisive importance of the principle of the least action.
It
appears with the order of the geometric evolution.
We obtain references to principle of the
least action, arguments of Galileo, Fermat,
De Broglie,
he
unified Fermat principle and the principle of minimum action in the
physical
essence. Equally Maxwell's equations can be extracted as the conditions
of the
principle of the least action. Even, Samuel Koenig claims the fact that
Leibniz
had declared the principle of the least action in a letter of 1707. His
formulations summarize the fact that the nature always reaches its
purposes of
a most economic way. It provided Lagrange's equations and
To speak about the transformations of
the
principle of the least action would make us endless. It changes his
name
according to the used application by his authors.
Example:
Principle of the least action, Principle of stationary action,
Principle of
stationary phase, Principle of SelfConsistency, Principle of
superposition,
The Path Of Noncancellation, Maupertuis'
Principle, Hamilton's Principle, etc.
On states of minimal energy the maximum
simplicity evidences coincide to Time concept, Paths or Quantum
Systems. Does
this show a base of fundamental simplicity?
Imagine many paths from one point to
another. The minimal path between both points
wouldbe when
the action is smaller or the principle of minor action. So, when
the
principle of the least action acquires stationary path conditions, the
other
different impulses are automatic annulled. Coinciding
with
the Schrödinger equation and its stationary solutions.
We should take his relations with the
concept of simplicity for reasons related to common sense. (Associating
his equivalence with the authority of entire numbers or harmonic orders
of Pitágoras).
Here, corresponds to take part Plato:
"God does constant geometry". The geometry is the natural language of
the universe.
According to some authors the principal
question had to put, in practice, the characteristics related to the
wave. The
two more elementary measures, referred to the geometry of the waves,
they are
width and longitude. The two rectangular directions correspond to each
wavelength.
Being the basic unit of the minimum
wavelength, we encounter the murder of Hispassus
attributed to Pythagoras. It happened, when Hispassus
dared to discuss to Pitágoras, the
value of the
diagonal of a square, the root of 2, as a natural value opposite to his
entire
numbers. Hisspasus's tragedy was based on
a
contradiction that Pitágoras
considered to be a
falsehood. We will see it soon. In the Pythagorean dominion, any
noticed
component false, was the condemned death.
From 1619 to 1618, Kepler
enunciated outstanding laws, fundamental in the Solar System,
describing his
content to the square and the cube. Then they were reduced by
The question is: what here does the
square
and the cube defining the gravity, the speed, the distance, the energy
of the
waves and the concept of máss? Why
is it necessarily
to exact the square or the cube?
Good physicists have wondered: Because,
it
is not a bit any more, less, any other number? Why as an elemental
figure does
a square impose on the evolution of the physical universe? Why is its
accuracy
and presence necessary, in the epoch of interplanetary trips, of
organic
transplants, the computer science, direct manipulation of molecules, of
future
power of the qubits, etc.? If it does not
another
form, inevitably, behind it is the presence of any geometry of entire
elementary numbers.
Which would be the order of a geometric
progression with principle of the least action and maximum symmetry?
It can not be confused the principle of
minimum action with maximum vagrancy. The Principle of minimal action
must
relate to the Principle of
maximum efficiency. His association with the
break of the symmetry breaks vagrancy stability. So that obtaining a
worrying
initiative for the environment, it coincides with an initiative of
natural
selection.
To find out if it exists
an association between broke symmetry and principle of minimum action,
we have
deductions. The simplicity fundamental, in the geometry, it is to
deduce the
order of attributions, properties or ready dimensions, successively.
The
Pythagorean ones were establishing a geometric natural order, of 1
point, 2 line,
The
association, of maximum symmetry and the principle of the least action,
it
establishes an order of geometric simplicity and hierarchy. The biggest
simplicity of the square coincides with the minimal description of his
form.
Then, the square base of reference, is the
square side
unit, and root of two diagonals'. A demonstration we will obtain, from
the
tragedy of Hisspasus. Also it is warned,
from the
maximum geometric simplicity of the wave unit. Though
he will
remain submitted to more decisive tests in our work. Notice that
without
natural priority of the principle of minimum action, with the maxim
symmetry,
we would not know that we must speak of the square root of 2. (Also
saying
Pythagorean constant) Possibly also is the first irrational number known. The length of the diagonal of a square
length unit
can not be variable. This has important consequences.
Here the contradiction of Pythagoras:
Draw the diagonal of a square, forming
with
her the side of a new square. We continue designing squares for
successive
diagonals. (To see figure 1A) We can imagine an infinite growth.
Inversely, he
would drive to an infinite decrease.
Let us notice that each similar square
doubles its dimension. This fixes a natural link between half or the
double of
similar successive squares.
A square with a side in base, a square
happens with a vertex base nevertheless. This way, successive increase
is the
root of two.
But Pythagoras ignored the irrational
value
that can simultaneously be a whole value. A measure fixed of the unit
of
universal value does not exist. Therefore we can choose the value one,
to the
sides of any square.
This would be a proof of fundamental
geometry. We have occasion to prove here
the power of this simplicity. The question is, if the most elementary
geometry
implies the most elementary physics.
Example: We know that this geometric
succession is used in natural sequences as expression of fundamental
waves,
across waves of extent and square length and his relation with RMS.
The increasing successive magnitude (1x
1,404), it is double of magnitude successively diminishing (1x 0,707).
If we
add that in the wave expression of the square his magnitude unit being
divided
by his value RMS (1/0,707 = 1,404), we obtain a direct relation between
his
different forms of geometry.
What has to see the exposed thing here
with
the real structure of the Solar System? If only we know the exposed
thing, it
is very difficult to find something.
But
if we are in front of some fundamental used geometry in the nature, we
would be
in front of a key base of extension and contraction of the same one.
Notice
that in university mathematics the quadratic mean or RMS form a
statistical
measure of the magnitude of a variable quantity. While
Nature
here, since the simultaneity established, decides to implement the RMS
value as
a jump of effective valour. It is not considered an alternation.
So that in electricity and electronics
it is
named an effective value, to an alternate current that is transformed
to
rigorously constant circulating on a resistance.
Also we are defining the geometry of a
wave
of maximum simplicity, applying the principle of the least action.
A conservative mathematician might think
that
this is not correct. But the extraordinary thing is power to verify it
without
doubt being fundamentally correct. In the equations instead of seeing
numbers
and letters, we must see to his equalities, transformations and
equivalences.
To estimate the capacity of simple
transformations on the structure of
the Solar System, we have to know the power of simultaneity in physics.
We know that the stable bodies are associate to standing waves. In general his
material
accumulation prevents from verifying it simply. This can be detected,
when the
frequency of an external excitement recognizes the measurements
contained
across several types of resonances. In order to obtain it, it is used
from the
physical periods of vibrations to the magnetic nuclear resonances. Once
we are
sure of this, to know how this happens leads us to important
alternatives.
The question is:
We have not existence of fundamental
favourite direction, or imposed by the nature. This forces the
simultaneity of
the stationary waves. This way, the waves with equal extent, length of
wave and
speed moves in the opposite direction across the environment.
Consult "Superposition Principle of
Wave" Example:
www.schulphysik.de/ntnujava/waveSuperposition/waveSuperposition.html
Since the nature does not also impose
distances, though these are very big. We conclude in that the
simultaneity of
the opposite waves requires infinity speed. It would be better to be call it an infinite symmetry.
We
have a famous practical experience in Young's slits. To
present two slits, close to the size of a wave propitiating the step of
some
simultaneity. We can direct on them photons or electrons. We
know the
environment of the mechanics in order to photon and electron alone.
We know for Schrödinger's equation
the space
of the cloud that corresponds to the symmetry of every atomic level.
When we
want to know where it is the electron of the simultaneous inverse
trajectory,
we will have to arrive at the unpredictable thing.
Breaking to simultaneity us the
unpredictable thing materializes?
We
meet a distribution of particles on the screen posterior to the slits,
as if
the unpredictable thing materializes. That one is in some proportion of
the
space that occupies the wave. The probability corresponds to the cloud
form
mentioned inside the symmetry of the atom.
Some of them predict that immediately
two
particles should appear in two opposite sites, but with different
returns. But
only a particle appears.
Where have not we mistaken?
Here there do not appear fingerprints of
different drafts. On the other hand, it seems to be more rational, the
polarization as the electron and his hollow.
*****
The
photographic cameras are instruments that direct the light of an image
inside a
cavity. A printed ring usually figures around the lens in their
exterior with
the following steps: 1,4  2  2,8  4  5,5
 8  11
 16.
The
square of first series become doubles or halves, according to advance
or
back successive steps 2  4  8  16  32  64  128  256... It
indicates the
opening that corresponds to the area of the window that forms the
diaphragm.
Each step has successively twice, or has half quantity of used light.
For
another mechanism each step has successively twice or has half quantity
of used
time also.
Great
part of the photographic resources is obtained with the variation of
these
controls.
At
the moment, the waves are the structural language of physics. Their
possibilities did not still find the limit.
This
is the reason that the whole numbers show atom spectra limiting
structure of
the waves, of a musical instrument through the harmonic, of an antenna
through
modulations of kilocycles or a star through its seismology.
A strange aspect, are the lines of harmonic
field structure, or the lines of electromagnetic fields do not need
corporal
evidences. However, we can identify the lines when meeting with them
some free
particles in some cases. For example the salt, sand or sawdust, on
membranes,
boxes of resonance, tubes of Kundt or iron
filings in
magnetic fields.
They
can identify bodies or physical cavities, using whole fractions of
their
measures.
An
important application of the double series occupies the waves of the
sound. The
musical scale is based on successive octaves doubling its frequency.
All the
sounds of the orchestra music are approximately distributed among seven
octaves. An instrument that emitted the scales of the human hearing
would need
a structure able to contain the seven octaves that reach to be emitted
in the
orchestras simultaneously. Pitágoras
discovered them.
However
as Pitagoras and Kepler
also believed, the music of the octaves should be good to identify the
planetary structure of the solar system.
A structure, of agreement with scale where octaves double and
harmonic doubles are deduced inside pipes of Kundt
or organs.
Also the light steps' in the camera's, formed double frequency's scale.
There is a structure in doubles, insinuated by Bode law, whose origin
is
attributed to a Kepler rumour in search of
the Music
of the Spheres.
More scales of frequencies and energies are in sequences of doubles or
halves.
Preferably, related to distances, lengths of wave, diameters of musical
strings
or diameters of lenses.
It must suppose the place of each planet must have half and double
resonance,
within the cavity of the Solar System for its demonstration.
We call resonances to them double or half frequencies to associate
ideas of
context, although the characteristic special observed in their moment,
selfresonances should be called. We have prepared two tables with
resonant of
the planetary distances on double scales. Table 1.
The
distances corresponding to the planetary position go underlined. We
have
limited ourselves to the resonances that contain planets, to make sure
the
coincidence of testimonies with supposed line of corresponding octaves.
Table 1. PLANETARY RESONANCES
MERCURY 
57.92 
115.8 
231.6 
463.3 
926.7 
1853 
3706 
VENUS 
54.07 
108.1 
216.2 
432.5 
865.1 
1730 
3460 
EARTH 
74.80 
149.6 
299.2 
598.4 
1196 
2394 
4788 
MARS 
57 
114 
228 
456 
912 
1824 
3648 
JÚPITER 
97.28 
194.5 
389.1 
778.3 
1556 
3113 
6226 
SATURN 
89.37 
178.7 
357.5 
715.0 
1430 
2860 
5720 
URANUS 
89.84 
179.7 
359.3 
718.7 
1437.4 
2875 
5749 
NEPTUNE 
70.21 
140.4 
280.9 
561.7 
1123.5 
2247 
4494 
PLUTO 
92.31 
184.6 
369.2 
738.5 
1477 
2954 
5908 
Table 2. ORDER OF RESONANCES
JUPITER 
97.28 
194.5 
389.1 
778.3 
1556 
3113 
6226 
PLUTO 
92.31 
184.6 
369.2 
738.5 
1477 
2954 
5908 
URANUS 
89.84 
179.7 
359.3 
718.7 
1437.4 
2875 
5749 
SATURN 
89.37 
178.7 
357.5 
715.0 
1430 
2860 
5720 
EARTH 
74.80 
149.6 
299.2 
598.4 
1196 
2394 
4788 
NEPTUNE 
70.21 
140.4 
280.9 
561.7 
1123.5 
2247 
4494 
MERCURY 
57.92 
115.8 
231.6 
463.3 
926.7 
1853 
3706 
MARS 
57 
114 
228 
456 
912 
1824 
3648 
VENUS 
54.07 
108.1 
216.2 
432.5 
865.1 
1730 
3460 
We observed that certain dominion and limit of amplitude correspond to
the
greater mass of Jupiter.
Then, we can put in the table 2 distances and resonances order. This
table can
become measured on proportional lines to the Solar System in the figure
Johanns Kepler (1594),
Johann Titius (1766) and Johann Bode
(1772), they
approached to the discovery of this same structure. Kepler,
searching in "Mysterium Cosmographicum"
geometric reasons for the position of the planets, he tried to involve
squares
and other regular polygons in the circumscribed orbits of planets,
foreseeing
the usage of whole numbers in order to describe the planetary system.
The figure 1 reproduce an Kepler idea
coincident with series and squares of openings for photographic lenses.
In the
simplest succession of their inscribed squares of the figure 1 are the
reason
series Ö2, following
the
measures of the segments of its axes. Their whole numbers agree with
double
length of their segments. Another double series is like
successive areas.
Some has attributed to the same Kepler the possible insinuation of implicit succession of double distances or a double series masked. Almost two centuries later a double series would appear as TitiusBode Law or simply Bode Law, consistent in the adoption of 0, 3, 6, 12, etc. and adding the number 4 for observe its coincidence with planetary distances. Measured in 1/10 astronomical unit.
Figure 1A
Figure
1B. Squares
and
successively inscribed circles. Squares and circles successively
inscribed. This figure is also 1A seeing it from original point,
unifying
property by square root of two.Their axes are increased in series. 1  1,4

2  2,8  4  5,6  8  11,3  16 etc. They indicate a succession
of
steps by 1,414 (=Ö2 series). The areas formed by the
squares of the series increase as 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32,
etc. The same scale applied in the photographic cameras.
Here is presented a first conflict.
The scale's double in the figure 1 refer to areas, not at linear
distances.
The law of Bode refers to double linear distances. However, this
coincides when
they occupy only whole numbers. That is to say, on a linear dimension
of 1  1,4  2  2,8  4  etc. the
planet can only be in
positions of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, etc.
The
details of the figure 1 discover the minimum distance that separates
the
squares of the central point is on the axes of abscissas and ordinates.
The
maxim distances in the diagonal ends are 1,414...(=Ö2)
of the minimum ones. This provides two limits for the squares.
But
0,2929 is a part of the rectangular
axes. It
occupies the exterior wreath of area that has equal intern area.
The 0,2929 have need of an extension of
1+0,7071 for
the encircling part, in this case 1,7071x0.2929 = 0,5.
Where 10,2929 = 0,7071 (=1/Ö2).
It indicates the important line's RMS values for
cyclical sine waves.
We
point out something that seems obvious because this relationship also
has the
utility to transfer to arithmetic and geometry a form quantum of Solar
System.
To
displace, momentarily, an excess of more complicated arguments will
confront
the practical example simulating the discovery of an old game.
***
An old game to discover.
Already
a long time ago entered in conflict the symmetry, the exclusion, the
equivalence
and the successive order. It happened on a structure, made of straight
lines.
Inside a square crossed with two rectangular axes. Shorter straights'
lines
that cross the centre over numerous symmetrical lines. Figures 2, 3, 4,
and 5
should see to facilitate this description.
These
figures leave in a different way of building the figure one, with
proportional
equivalences. (It will be seen in figure 31, second part).
A
condition was imposed: All their expressions should be originated from
a single
figure 7,2929. The extensive number is 8(Ö2/2).
This imposes the number of their lines and their limits. Abscissas,
ordinates and other straight lines, angles, etc. From then on it
still
remains. A connection is to all ,
through 7,2929
x 2 fundamental angles with reflection abscissas' axis.
The game consists on solving a question:
How will we survive a catastrophe in the ocean, ignoring where there is
a
saving ship? or, how will we find the
asymmetric
points on symmetrical nodes?
Although
it seems incredible, nature has been able to have this structure to
play the
well known game of the sinking of ships on the grid. A special
interpretation
inverted.
Where everything can sink, excepting the saving
ships.
Here each ship only occupies a node.
Before
drowning in a supposedly chaotic sea in a catastrophe, the shipwrecked
should
find the ships. They are the particles in search of nodes. This would
be our
game.
The game that plays the nature begins when from a point of an
environment a
catastrophe happens. A great quantity of masses with energy,
perpendicularly is spread.
It reaches certain limits and it is reflected. Before attenuating, it
oscillates as an echo in a box of resonance. The mass and energy try to
find
the points where to settle down. The shipwrecked person has little time
to
lose, going at random.
The
nature has been cruel in both cases, but on the other hand it has
established 5
rules to find them.
The energy and the matter know it. The shipwrecked person ignores it.
For
luck, the perpendicular dimensions also have other incompatibilities.
This way, the fundamental nodes must be on concrete abscissas.
These abscissas are naturally: zero, ±0,7071...
and the limit abscissa of the squares,
±1.
The
game begins.
Before the catastrophe it was a symmetrical order. Fig.
2.
Introduced momentary chaos, a conflict among the symmetries (the
structure
distribution), the equivalence (equal division for 7, 2929), the
asymmetries
(exclusive property) and demands of the successive order, appears.
The
fractional part supposes a frontier tunnel in infinite connection.
The interior structure represents nodes among whole numbers.
Rules.
1. "Only it fits a natural point
(life
ship) on the fundamental angle of each equal division.”
However, it has 7 possible nodes. (The possible number is limited to
each
angle). Fig. 2, 3, 4 y 5.
2. "In the
catastrophe, couples symmetrical
points are transferred to an exclusive position of the effective
section
(1/7,2929), of rights quadrants (+) from zero of abscissas.”
The central one is without displacing. (We limit the search to 2
quadrants). Fig. 3 and 5.
3. "The
displaced ship's nodes are on the
right side angles from the zero vertexes." (We isolated the half of
sides). Fig.3 and 5.
4. " The
displacements go away successively
with an abscissa more, from the axis zero and from distance zero.
"
(Their position is located) Fig. 3 and 4.
Consequently when bending by the axis, the busy asymmetries don't
coincide but
they supplement order. Fig. 4.
This way, an asymmetric node must be exclusively on its abscissa and
its
symmetrical ones.
However, everything doesn't finish this way. A second perpendicular
dimension
appears from excess charge, accidents or mutinies. Ships leave in two
and in
these cases the rule 5 substitute for the rule 4.
5.
" With broken displacements, also on 1/Ö2
and central
axis new areas broken in two for to occupy the most opposed exclusive
abscissas
in their lines."
We
find atomic analogies with the formation of dipolar moments and, or,
"When
particles or packages of waves unfolded, they went away toward opposed
ends. " (C. Stroud and
J. Yeazell.
The nature surprisingly also here repeats
its formulas
in the partition of the cells for mitosis. The chromosomes duplicated
previously in the metaphase form an equatorial line. In the anaphase
they leave
and they go toward the perpendicular opposed poles. In the telophase,
the different poles are rejected, believe
barriers and
they separate finally.
When
applying the conditions of the search for stable nodes, we will find in
each
one of them ¡a planet!.
Fig. 2 
Fig. 3 
Fig. 4 
Fig. 5 
The horizontal distance order of points of figure 5 corresponds to
Mercury, Venus,
Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and Pluto.
Vertical order of abscissas from the base of
the square.
Venus, Mars, Mercury (Inferior quadrant).
Neptune, Earth. (Central axis).
Saturn, Uranus, Pluto (Superior quadrant)
Jupiter (Superior limit).
Among them, Venus and Pluto they are displaced and retrograde.
This image detailed, in figure 43 and 44 (Second part). This structure represents dimensions to register allows
positions
and real displacements.
It presents a diagram of simultaneous transitions between levels and
sublevels,
of 1/7,2929, 1/7,2929^{2} and
1/7,2929^{3}
spaces.
The angular concept corresponds to the turn of the axes.
These designate whole numbers to the succession of abscissas.
Believe areas with an accumulation of 2, 8, 18 and 32 nodes. It
incorporates
the separation of levels through their simple resonance's.
The distribution of electrons in the atomic levels, they point out a
tendency
toward the symmetry.
It reaches this representation in the (22), Magnesium (282), Calcium
(2882), Strontium (281882), Barium (28181882), Radium
(2818321882).
This symmetry is an unquestionable fact that would be impossible
without the
existence of equivalence abilities, for levels.
There is not equivalence of forces between proton nucleus and electron
of
orbit?
There is not equivalence of space or time, when planets occupy same
areas in
same time?
How many different equivalences are of
forms,
according to their purpose?
An
active testimony to Ö2 is the cosmic speed presence, in
order of the Solar System.
The horizontal velocity needed an artificial satellite upon overcoming
the
gravity that corresponds to the attraction from a planetary surface,
first
cosmic velocity is called.
If this circular speed is increased in
Nevertheless,
an escape velocity for a planet becomes elliptic with respect to the
Sun, as
does any other planet.
To be free of Sun force a planet an increase requires of velocity again
by Ö2.
The
Earth speed is approximately 29.76 km/s. Its speed of flight of the
Solar
System would be of 29.76xÖ2 =
This
last one is distinguished to be added about a stable speed.
To
value action and reaction, we would have to relate to the impulse speed
limit
exit from the system with a setback.
A supposition, that we do not seeks to
prove, this
would justify a structure.
If the addition of xÖ2 is the speed that would transfer a
half planet to the exterior of the
Solar System,
it is also the speed that would take to the other half planet in half
distance.
Then all the planets would have some permanent linking with two limits.
We
have prints of a natural scale succession for
The decisive thing is that Ö2 is an expression different from
physical laws as the evident gravity.
It doesn't depend on any constant.
It is a structural condition for physical magnitudes.
On the other hand, the beautiful structures that show numerous
explosions of stars, cannot be built by
simple gravity. This renovates the
polemic about the gravity and their geometric submission.
Then
it exists: a first domain of the gravity of the issuing planet; the
domain of
the circular speeds; the domain of the parabolic speeds and the field
of the
hyperbolic speeds.
Somehow, this supposes put steps to the gravity.
In
the same way, the mechanic quantum, the structure of sounds, the
structure of
electromagnetic waves, the rule of atomic construction, etc.
We
know, the gravity law is a continuous law
until the
infinite. However practically it should be applied to discontinuous or
closed
forms with potential barriers.
With the physics that studies today the solar system, any planetary
position is
possible and they are where they are by chance. A celestial body
happening close
would affect the position of all of the planets.
Does it distance and is time continuous with discontinuous speed? It
should not
happen for discontinuous speeds, neither with cosmic speeds linked to
structure
of a double law it distances. This linking would go against the
previous
simplicity.
The
law of gravity explains the laws of Kepler,
but it
cannot predict the observance of a pure law of Bode. Although the
relativity
applies and the mass curves to the space and the time, it would lack
the
quantum. If on the contrary we admit the quantification in the atom for
the
intervention of the similar law of Coulomb, we admit the quantified
law.
It is the same used law to establish the distance of the atomic levels
in
transition state from the first equations of Bohr and of
Schrödinger that
interprets a supposed reality.
A
planetary system with levels of resonance would suppose a suspicion of
solar
system quantification, when involving distances of whole values in its
structure. We will have to accept its coexistence with the physics to
the
square.
Then
the allowed places are predictable by the successive exclusion of
angles sides
and abscissas. We here remember the exclusion rules discovered by Pauli for the quantum numbers.
We find other atomic analogies. The electrons change its turn, when
passing
over a barrier for the tunnel effect. It is the case of trajectories
turn of
Venus and Pluto when passing above the limit 0,7071...
(1/Ö2).
To
justify this work the questions are:
Why a simple plane, made only of symmetrical straight lines, it can
represent
all the dimensions of a curved full Solar System?
Why is the physics of the orbits manifested with square and cube laws
instead
of circle or sphere?
Why is the TitiusBode law, inexact for
planetary
distances to become simpler and more exact law for structure lines?
Why do their levels divide their space in uniform and symmetrical
units?
Why is the equivalence of its levels according to other known physics
by
different references?
Why characteristic of fractal structure repeating only one
fractional figure does have, in their construction, toward
smaller
dimensions?
Why developing the subtracted reflections two halves are reflected,
that
acquire characteristic of a hologram of reduced reproductions, on 1/Ö2
originated? (Figs.34, 35 and 36, second part).
Why does it contain a symmetrical expansion of its centre and not
regard to the
Sun?
Why does it show the existence of a point zero and hour zero in the
history of
the Solar System?
Why the ordinates and the abscissas, generated for their nodes have to
be
exclusive?
Why applying exclusion rules to its lines, is the position of the
planets
predicted?
Why can all this be obtained using a single fraction, (0,13711=1/7,2929),
as only construction measure, by chance?
Since
the fine structure also appears in fractal adaptations, (137,036 = 1/0,0072973). Does not number turn out to be curious
to be so
near to the number of the fine structure that mentions Feymann?
It's one
of the greatest damn mysteries of physics: a magic number that
comes to us with no understanding by man. You might say the "hand of
God" wrote that number, and "we don't know how He pushed his
pencil."
***
See the answer of