A
different interpretation for the atomic structure
(Please forgive my faulty English)
With the Big Bang is supposed birth of the matter
formed of
first protons and neutrons.
It was necessary to wait to some cooling as base of
conditions
to the stable structures
The common hydrogen
appeared like
simpler atoms and Helium continued with smaller measure.
The carbon and the oxygen were detected accompanying
other
slight atoms' constituting stars. It happened around 600/700 million of
years
after the Big Bang, acquiring the stage of the nucleus of iron.
The Core of iron reaches
a
critical mass. This approximately 250
million later
years.
The star is contracted suddenly to become a star of
neutrons.
While their external layers are explode
forming
supernovas.
An enormous energy of stars' shock wave supernova,
wraps up
in heavy atoms.
Supposedly thus the rest of the structures is
created than
we know in the Periodic System.
***
It was necessary to possess a succession of stable
conditions, as
base of its structure.
Finally the evolution finds even 7 steps in
order.
The 8 was shown rebellious. They would be
sufficient. It
granted them the category of numbers. With them a universe already
could build.
It would be enough a method of symmetries with some
numbers
inside others. The method of the symmetry would have extraordinary
abilities
with putting special order.
Each number must be at the same time the sum of two
of its
figures. The first number of these couples would have the n
virtues'
called. The second would have l virtues. The n
would be
always superior to l.
This way, the couple's would form a succession of
exclusive
numbers and sum equal. See
8
=5+3=6+2=7+1=8+0.
7 =4+3=5+2=6+1=7+0.
6
=4+2=5+1=6+0.
5 =3+2
=4+1=5+0.
4
=3+1=4+0.
3
=2+1=3+0.
2
=2+0.
1
=1+0.
These series,
would-be endowed of physical components, to use periods. They should
take
exclusive place completing symmetries.
The bricks obtained order. We will show the construction
of their
first building in form of tables. We do not forget that it is a factory
of to
build the symmetries. Another thing is that the levels and the
sublevels house
different energy distributions.
RULE N+L. TABLE 1 TO FILL ORDER.
|
Levels order (a) =n+l |
1 .......... |
2 .......... |
3 .......... |
4 .......... |
5 .......... |
6 .......... |
7 .......... |
8 .......... |
(b)
|
(c) Atoms |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
10 |
6 |
2 |
32 |
X. 120 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
14 |
10 |
6 |
2 |
|
32 |
Ra 88 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
10 |
6 |
2 |
|
|
18 |
Ba 56 |
|
5 |
|
|
10 |
6 |
2 |
|
|
|
18 |
Sr 38 |
|
4 |
|
|
6 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
Ca 20 |
|
3 |
|
6 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
Mg 12 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Be 4 |
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
He 2 |
|
|
2 |
8 |
18 |
32 |
32 |
18 |
8 |
2 |
|
|
|
Levels order (a) =n+l |
1 .......... |
2 .......... |
3 .......... |
4 .......... |
5 .......... |
6 .......... |
7 .......... |
8 .......... |
(b)
|
Atoms (c) |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
14 (17) |
10(18) |
6(19) |
2(20) |
32 |
X. 120 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
14(13) |
10(14) |
6(15) |
2(16) |
|
32 |
Ra 88 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
10(10) |
6(11) |
2(12) |
|
|
18 |
Ba 56 |
|
5 |
|
|
10(7) |
6(8) |
2(9) |
|
|
|
18 |
Sr 38 |
|
4 |
|
|
6(5) |
2(6) |
|
|
|
|
8 |
Ca 20 |
|
3 |
|
6(3) |
2(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
Mg 12 |
|
2 |
|
2(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Be 4 |
|
1 |
2(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
He 2 |
|
|
2 |
8 |
18 |
32 |
32 |
18 |
8 |
2 |
|
|
The horizontal line
superior
indicates the order of levels with the number n.
(a) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. The components of l are
under
them.
It will not see the 0, 1, 2, 3 mentioned
numbers
previously. To achieve the symmetry with all the atoms, they have
to be
substituted by the number of their components. Here l
= 0, 1,
2, 3 = 2(l +1) = 2, 6, 10, 14.
In their horizontal line, the period's couples are
distributed with sequence mentioned.
The
following table, within a parenthesis the construction
incorporates, coincident with successive energy of the atom's basic
states.
We will see
that sublevels in the horizontal of the periods belong to atomic
successive
numbers.
We vertically see n levels, composed simultaneously
with
sublevels' of atomic different successive numbers.
However, this fulfils an important symmetry between
them.
While the level's order vertically filled is with growing sublevels'
(2,6, 10,
14), the period's order horizontally filled is with falling
sublevels'
(14,10, 6, 2).
Observe then that the highest sublevel in each
column is
also the first member of the period to the right and it belongs to both
parts
of a strange two-dimensional symmetry. The different sums of columns or
lines
coincide with the atomic series 2n2 in these
cases.
These magic numbers
of the rule invite us to investigate this perpendicular relationship.
If
between two directions, with different assignments, a dependency
ignored is
discovered, this can be some important physical implication. Notice
that the
vertical succession happens before the perpendicular symmetrical order.
Then
each level, like in the cells it happens, contains information of the
following
construction.
We know that the atom of the hydrogen has 2n2
successive numbers for levels' transitions. We know how these
successive levels
are occupied by 2n2 electrons in the following atoms.
If to this numeric behavior of
levels
the symmetry conditions assign 2n2, it is advancing an
atomic whole
structure prediction.
Note that the n2 series behaves in the rule n+l, demanding a symmetry to become in 2n2.
So, fundamental appearance condition of this rule is the
formation of
symmetrical atoms.
Note that each line
of periods added, produces a general symmetry in the distribution of
electrons.
That is to say: 2, * 2-2,* 2-8-2, * 2-8-8-2,* 2-8-18-8-2, *
2-8-18-18-8-2, * 2-8-18-32-18-8-2, * 2-8-18-32-32-18-8-2*
electrons.
Their structures correspond to the atoms with the numbers of 2, 4, 12,
20, 38,
56, 88 and 120. They are known as He, Be, Mg, Ca, Sr,
Ba, Ra, and X. Are indicated in the
column (b).
Scientific
terminology indicates the capacity for the sublevel's 2, 6, 10, 14,
upon
letters representing numbers: 2 = s, 6 = p, 10 = d
and 14 = f.
Figure 1. Atomic radius.
We see, in descending order, groups of points formed by the
sublevels
that compose the periods. Some exceptions that are observed overlapping
between
sublevels', explanation finds when they are separate. Are designated by
their
capacity, letter and number, and the atomic numbers of limits. The
parentheses
indicate the level that the sublevel l is added.
The lines of the
superior and inferior margin indicate us two forms of distinguishing
the
periods. Obtain them when prolonging on the figure the separation
between their
numbers.
The virtues that
distinguish the classification of the periods for the line of the rule
are:
These maintain the symmetry of the rule n+l.
These maintain an order of pairs,
(2.
2. 8. 8. 18. 18. ...)
These separate a succession of levels,
(1); (2); (2)(3); (3)(4);
(3)(4)(5); (4)(5)(6); (4)(5)(6)(7); ...
These separate an inverse sublevels
succession,
2s; 2s; 6p,2s; 6p,2s;
10d,6p,2s; 10d,6p,2s;
The classification, from
the line of the inferior margin, separates the descending successive
sublevels
as they are exposed in the Periodic Table. Its imperfections are:
These do not maintain the symmetry of the rule n+l.
These break for the first one the pair order, (
2.
8. 8. 18. 18. ...)
These do not separate a succession of levels.
(1); (2)(2); (3)(3);
(4)(3)(4);
(5)(4)(5); (6)(4)(5)(6); ...
These do not separate an inverse sublevels
succession.
2s; 2s,6p; 2s,6p;
2s,10d,6p; 2s,10d,6p; 2s,14f,10d,6p; ...
If we call steps to
the difference between radii of successive numbers, the average of the
steps
surpasses double its compression when sublevels change. (0,279,
0,129,
0,054 and 0,024, to 2, 6, 10 y 14). (Consult the tables 6 and 7
at the
end).
Here it stands
out a question to be difficult to explain the step's why reduces the
atom
radius when adding electrons? Does it imagine a deposit, where adding
the
matter, becomes smaller?
Some atomic radii reduce their size more than the half,
with the
filled of a sublevel.
For example, sublevels of number 5 at 10 and 13 at
18.
This is not
understood well with repulsion of Coulomb force, or even adding
protons. This
does not explain why a couple of electrons added annulling the law and
they can
travel with opposed turns. It does not explain because spin coupled
annuls the
law and a pair can travel attachés with opposed rotations. It
does not explain
the reason, the full levels become ionic armour. Why, the
electrons
circulating has lost the condition to emit the Maxwell radiation.
Even this way,
the physics requires an interpretation where the lost radius must
substitute
the increased level with more energy, mass and charge. Let us, leave
this
observation for the end.
The rule indicates
to parts compressed, like components of a level, in perpendicular
symmetry. It
is interesting to recognize that the averages substitute for this
environment
the uniformity of the whole numbers and their symmetries inside atoms.
For the atomic
theory an atom with the rule n in their interior it can be related with
the one
box resonance. Regrettably it is necessary to break the surface to
check their
interior and it can only be making with the destruction of numerical
order.
There is not possibility to know their interior directly.
Before continuing is
necessary to clarify another possible confusion. The levels' order from
the
radius table is obtained heaping one period above another, in form that
indicates the rule. The necessity of this accumulation indicates
that
interior atom structure cannot correspond directly to successive radii
of these
periods.
Practically,
starting from the third level, each new order of the period begins
crossing to
the interior, crossing other levels. If it is extracted or an electron
of the
14f is inserted this will pass over two levels
already
included without caring the condition of circular or spherical
armour interposed.
It does not present fracture, any destruction, that it distinguishes
these
penetrations.
If the Solar System
observes the rule n+l, a planet
would contain
the information of the whole system. This seems impossible because it
would be
necessary to demonstrate the existence of levels, symmetries and
equivalences
that the rule demands. Also, the rule refers to a structure of symmetry
that
seems to reject its direct relationship with the materialization of the
energy,
the mass, the distance, the speed, the density or the forces. The rule
seems to
ignore the rest of the physics.
Nevertheless the rule establishes atoms that in fact are
present
in the reality.
We can add structural content. The 1/137 constitute nondimensional number, to relate the fine
structure
to the rest of the levels. But it can also discover structure in the
Solar
System. It seems to point out some correspondence.
Notice than series of the harmonic fractions,
1/0 - 2/1 - 3/2 - 4/3 - 5/4 - 6/5
when it is multiplied by their inverse operation,
0x1 - 1x2 - 2x3 - 3x4 - 4x5 - 5x6.
the distribution of 2n obtains.
1 - 4 - 9 -
16 - 25 - 36
Marc Torra, reader, insists
on your desire
“to understand the relation between the harmonic fractions 2/3, 3/4,
4/5, and
the series of 2n2 (2, 8, 18, …)”, we try
to
clarify
The harmonic frequencies correspond to proper modes of a
structure.
The harmonic fractions, in ours case corresponds to
physical
supposed successive levels, where n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6...,
Let's leave 0 as an impossible mathematician. Here the
physical
order demands the existence of the level 1.
Observe that every number itself repeats twice, for its
previous
relation and for its relation following.
Every series represents a relation different from
structure.
This way, the second series manifest another form of
relation with
the same levels.
Nevertheless, multiplying the same order, in both series,
we
obtain for its numbers an elevation of more complex structure.
1 - 2 -
1,5-
1,333, - 1,25- 1,2 -
1 - 2 - 6
- 12
-
20 - 30
1 - 4 - 9
- 16
- 25
- 36
Surprisingly, it corresponds with the material capacity of
the
distribution order of electrons.
It is similar to meet the mechanics of a new property.
Doubling the distribution we obtain the bipolarity
with 2n2.
Its better comprehension follows the periodic
configuration
of successive atoms on table of the figure 3.
The present science describes atomic structure with idea
of Broglie particles and wave equation of
Schrödinger. However
in our scale of nature the experience of particle/waves does not exist.
Really,
we do not know what they mean. Something similar happens with the
interpretation
of the turn of the electron. Their equations represent different
behaviours of
the energy.
For example, we have
to replace lost radius by incorporation into energy, mass and
charge. The
problem can be that the strangest phenomena in our science coincide
with
different forms of the same physics. The relativity of Einstein has
curved the
space absorbing associated with the condensation of a mass.
For the relativity
there should exist a proportion of mass, energy, and curvature space,
implied in
the atom. The atom is electromagnetic energy accepted like E = mc2.
Also in the atom gravitational effects are proportional to mass and are
inversely proportional to the square of distance.
If we are really
demanding, E = mc2 must also add a quantum structure
with
geometric and symmetrical implication of integers. For this, we have to
incorporate in the atom the concept of aggregation rules for the
gravity and
disintegration for the escape. With the electrons force accumulating in
level
armour and the ionization of the electrons.
We see how the
nature maintains some fundamental mathematical games to form its
structures.
Suppose you that order and the symmetries that it shows the rule also
adopt the
Principle of Laves, of the possible higher symmetry for their interior
stability, starting from the use of the numbers elementary adopted by
the
quantum mechanics.
R. B. Woodward (Nobel) and R. Hoffmann, J., say in "The
Conservation of the Orbital Symmetry" that geometric balance
reason
that avoids the reactions against the principle of conservation of
symmetrical
levels.
The electron configuration in the stable atom is similar to
order
of fundamental energy. Therefore, each sublevel or level is a
fragmentation of
that continuity.
The following lines
show how the symmetry represents the configuration.
An elementary origin
for its symmetry would be on a straight line crossing a point, with
addition of
pairs, one for side of the central point forming series of 1, 3, 5, 7
points
separated by repulsion. With symmetrical demands of repulsion the
double
dimension requires a repetition or simultaneous reflection regarding
another
central axis. The 2 (1, 3, 5, 7) appear in a distribution
of growth
like in the following table.
-3., -2, -l.,...0....+l, +2, +3,
-2, -l., 0, +l, +2,
-l., 0, +l,
...0...
...0...
-l., 0, +l,
-2, -l., 0, +l, +2,
-3., -2, -l.,...0....+l, +2, +3,
If 4 new electrons
increase the capacities, we locate them in the ends-square space of
successive
levels with symmetrical repulsion. These separations also associate
with the
rule of Hund for antiparallel
places. The series composed by 2n2 = 2, 8, 18, 32
indicates
the capacity of the different atomic levels. If they must absorb a
radius of
lost spaces, they should have own space that the step of others should
allow.
The rings of the big
planets demonstrate the existence of the central plane, then these
electrons
can be to accommodate to a spherical figure with polarities the effect
of Coriolis.
Figure 2
Demanding more, they will also have to be adapted to the disposition of the quantum numbers. Fig. 3.
Figure 3. Geometric representation of the
quantum numbers.
The quantum numbers
designate the four orders of the energy of an electron adapted to
orders of
geometric symmetry. They are distinguished for four letters: n,
l,
m, s.
At the moment, we have enough about these numbers to note the
following:
(n) The column n, it indicates to interior distribution between
two
number limits' of each level. These are usually also indicated with
capital
letters. The numeric order 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 it is equal to K, L,
N, O, R,
P, Q. But, we use the capital letters to indicate the line L.
(l) The column l designates lines of distribution of the sublevels with
numbers' or letters' l. The letters obey a historical origin. It
indicates the two opposed lines of the antiparallel
places, of Hund.
(m) It designates the internal order configuration or the values
of
magnetic separation components. The states indicated by most of
the
quantum mechanics refer to alteration states. There are not indications
in the
state of electrons' aggregation, without magnetic separation.
(s) It designates for two polarities or opposed spins, in this case
located in
different hemispheres 1/2 and +1/2.
The quantum
mechanics considered as physics of the alteration of the fundamental
states of
the matter or the energy, there are not indications of aggregation of
electrons
without magnetic separation. When a magnetic action intervenes, the
four
numbers show us its structure by the total unfolding of its
energy. Many
of the authors use the four numbers with intervention of the magnetic
field
with the denomination n, l, ml, and ms.
Complementary:
(a) It adds the total capacity of the order of distribution included in
both
parts.
L) This order designate embraced width by the places of the possible
transitions. Their capital letters can also indicate the sum of values,
implied, in an orbital moment.
Not confuse order
capacity with levels' order. Most of the atoms, they do not occupy this
capacity. Order of symmetrical occupation of levels, it is
invested in
every period when passing the centre filling. For most of the physics,
the
places for occupying do not exist, however, they stay here, to
designate order
of the possible transitions for alteration. (Soon we will add an
appendix with
image utility for representation of transitions).
The moment has
arrived, of treating the important question left behind when an
extraordinary
and strange perpendicular symmetry was noticed.
The rule cannot ignore its physical repercussion. We have the
symmetries
for periods of the rule, order of atomic radios and the Periodic Table.
They
cannot be spiritual. Where are the whole numbers and their symmetries
in the
measured reality of the radii?
It is interesting to admit that the uniformity of the whole numbers and
their
symmetries inside the atoms have to be in the called averages of
similar energy
including uncertainties.
A connection should exist between the rule and the physics without
recognizing
still.
The particles of gases can have an infinite difference of
masses,
speeds, spaces and directions inside their physical limits.
Nevertheless, law of Avogadro say, that the particles of gases
complete
with its masses, speed, and space a fixed average of superior
dimension.
Meanwhile, everything is allowed to the individual particle for to take
borrowed freedoms in their smallest dimension.
Different positions or speeds allow, for the symmetry with time
of the
pendulums, that inevitably will have to complete an average of a unit
of
superior symmetry. The same uncertainty is not more than a principle
that has
to form a symmetry through the time.
We do not need other examples. A new panorama is approached starting
from new
conclusion
Let us see the distribution of the averages corresponding to the
components of each level.
Let us see the differences of the individual radii in the
periods, as
freedom from energy options related inevitably with the integers
2, 8,
18, 32, 18, 8, 2.
Then, let us see the distribution of the averages corresponding to the
components of each level.
For this confirmation sees table 2 and the following
tables at the
end.
TABLE 2 ORDER FOR COMPRESSION AVERAGES FILLED
TABLE 5. ELECTRONIC RADIUS IN PERIODS
TABLE 6. AVERAGES OF SUBLEVELS COMPRESSION
TABLE 7. STRUCTURE OF AVERAGES OF A SUPPOSED ATOM IN SYMMETRICAL LEVELS
We will verify with the measures of the averages they also
indicate the natural construction of a general symmetry for the system.
TABLE 2
ORDER FOR COMPRESSION AVERAGES FILLED
|
Order levels (a) =n+l |
1 .......... |
2 .......... |
3 .......... |
4 .......... |
5 .......... |
6 .......... |
7 .......... |
8 .......... |
(b)
|
(c)Atoms |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
0,0242 |
0,0537 |
0,129 |
0,279 |
32 |
X. 120 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
0,0242 |
0,0537 |
0,129 |
0,279 |
|
32 |
Ra 88 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
0,0537 |
0,129 |
0,279 |
|
|
18 |
Ba 56 |
|
5 |
|
|
0,0537 |
0,129 |
0,279 |
|
|
|
18 |
Sr 38 |
|
4 |
|
|
0,129 |
0,279 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
Ca 20 |
|
3 |
|
0,129 |
0,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
Mg 12 |
|
2 |
|
0,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Be 4 |
|
1 |
0,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
He 2 |
|
|
2 |
8 |
18 |
32 |
32 |
18 |
8 |
2 |
|
|
We said that if the Solar System observes the rule n+l, a planet
would
contain the information of the whole system. But to complete this
puzzle
is lacking more pieces:
Their mathematical equivalences; the measure of masses; the
symmetry
among the orbits; the radius of the planets; where are charges?
It seems that we have finished.
Let us notice
the importance of the moment in the atomic structure. Simplifying, the
angular
moment is the product of mass, speed and distances of the rotation
axis. The
angular momentum can only adopt certain values' whole multiples of the
constant
of Planck.
Their differences indicate the atomic structure.
When the momentum concentrate, the rotation increases for
the
conservation of the momentum.
Due to the gravity in stars rotation are effected bulk
masses
incorporation and collapses that make unavoidable a sudden exchange of
the
momentum. We can verify with the turns falling, in the atoms, that
together
would have the momentum sum.
In the final aggregation, the original momentum is
substituted by
bigger radial speed.
However, it is
not the momentum knowledge that provides the mechanics of the
aggregation or
disintegration.
But rather the structure absorbed by the gravity should be
restored by the antigravity.
This has a known formulation in the escape speed that
there would
be of substituting to the knowledge of the impulse.
Escape speed2 = 2GM/R, or
=
(2G x M/R)1/2
G is the gravitational constant equal to 6.670 x 10-8 cm2/gram
sec2.
For universal
gravitation law and then for the relativity, we know that the force of
attraction of planets has a relationship with the quantity of mass.
These laws
seem enough to explaining all the movements of the universe. However,
neither
the gravity nor the relativity predict the existent structure.
If the distances and energy needs to have corresponding masses
order, we
have a system to justify the structure of the rule. And we could build
an
atomic structure, as an elementary Solar System.
Also the solar system coincides with a symmetrical structure and
regular
levels in a model that predicts the distances and the planetary speeds.
Consult
“On The Structure Solar System” http://137.awardspace.info/2604onthetrue.htm
Being this way, the previous supposed relationships, that could
not be
proven directly in the atom, if they will be able to make it in the
Solar
System noticing their relationship with the general
symmetry. See
table 3 the escape speeds corresponding to the planets of the Solar
System.
In them neither symmetries nor levels are appreciated.
See what happens locating measures and order of
symmetrical levels
on resonance box, only built leaving of 137, with geometric arguments
in the
pattern mentioned. Table 4.
Checking
TABLE 3. ESCAPE SPEEDS OF PLANETS
|
Planet .......... |
Mean Distance (km) |
Radius (km) |
Mass (kg) |
Escape speeds |
Proportion /1,919 |
Atomic Symmetry |
|
Mercury |
57910 |
2439 |
3.30e23 |
4.2 |
2.19 |
|
|
Venus |
108200 |
6052 |
4.87e24 |
10.4 |
5,42 |
|
|
Earth |
149600 |
6378 |
5.98e24 |
11.2 |
5,83 |
|
|
Mars |
227940 |
3398 |
6.42e23 |
5.0 |
2.6 |
|
|
Jupiter |
778000 |
71492 |
1.90e27 |
59.5 |
31 |
|
|
Saturn |
1429000 |
60268 |
5.69e26 |
35.5 |
18,49 |
|
|
Uranus |
2870990 |
25559 |
8.69e25 |
21.3 |
11,1 |
|
|
Neptune |
4504300 |
24764 |
1.02e26 |
23.5 |
12,24 |
|
|
Pluto |
5913520 |
1160 |
1.32e22 |
1.3 |
0.68 |
|
TABLE 4. SPEEDS OF IT ESCAPE WITH SYMMETRIES
|
Planet .......... |
Mean Distance (km) |
Radius (km) |
Mass (kg) |
Escape speeds |
Proportion /1,919 |
Atomic symmetry |
|
Mercury |
57910 |
2439 |
3.30e23 |
4.2 |
2.19 |
2 |
|
Venus/Mars |
291750 |
3099 |
5,51e24 |
15,4 |
8.02 |
8 |
|
Earth/Neptune |
583500 |
11967 |
1.08e26 |
34.7 |
18,08 |
18 |
|
Jupiter |
778000 |
71492 |
1.90e27 |
59.5 |
31 |
32 |
|
Saturn |
1429000 |
60268 |
5.69e26 |
35.5 |
18,49 |
18 |
|
Uranus |
2870990 |
25559 |
8.69e25 |
21.3 |
11,1 |
8 |
|
Pluto |
5913520 |
1160 |
1.32e22 |
1.3 |
0.68 |
2 |
***
The possible
obtaining of this symmetry between diffuse and dense planets,
surprise by the difference masses.
However, the formation of an extraordinary material condensation to the heavy elements requires so
much energy
that is not considered possible inside the Solar System.
The symmetry of the levels finds two couples' planets added in a
previous
place.
In that case, Neptune and Earth, they formed a previous planet
where
occupy the asteroids, converted into
the central
dot of box.
Let us remember that the inclination of Uranus and orbit Pluto
are
attributed to displacements in the origin of system.
This can be observed applied to the Solar System, in http://perso.wanadoo.es/30127/2604onthetrue.htm
Complementary tables
used.
Numbers and radius corresponding to the
periods of the
figure 1.
TABLE 5. ELECTRONIC RADIUS IN PERIODS
|
87 2.70 |
88 2.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2s(7) |
|
81 2.08 |
82 1.81 |
83 1.63 |
84 1.53 |
85 1.43 |
86 1.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6p(6) |
|
71 2.25 |
72 2.16 |
73 2.09 |
74 2.02 |
75 1.97 |
76 1.92 |
77 1.87 |
78 1.83 |
79 1.79 |
80 1.76 |
|
|
|
|
10d(5) |
|
57 2.74 |
58 2.70 |
59 2.67 |
60 2.64 |
61 2.62 |
62 2.59 |
63 2.56 |
64 2.54 |
65 2.51 |
66 2.49 |
67 2.47 |
68 2.45 |
69 2.42 |
70 2.40 |
|
|
55 3.34 |
56 2.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2s(6) |
|
49 2.00 |
50 1.72 |
51 1.53 |
52 1.42 |
53 1.32 |
54 1.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6p(5) |
|
39 2.27 |
40 2.16 |
41 2.08 |
42 2.01 |
43 1.95 |
44 1.89 |
45 1.83 |
46 1.79 |
47 1.75 |
48 1.71 |
|
|
|
|
10d(4) |
|
37 2.98 |
38 2.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2s(5) |
|
31 1.81 |
32 1.52 |
33 1.33 |
34 1.22 |
35 1.12 |
36 1.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6p(4) |
|
21 2.09 |
22 2.00 |
23 1.92 |
24 1.85 |
25 1.79 |
26 1.77 |
27 1.67 |
28 1.62 |
29 1.57 |
30 1.53 |
|
|
|
|
10d(3) |
|
19 2.77 |
20 2.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2s(4) |
|
13 1.82 |
14 1.46 |
15 1.23 |
16 1.09 |
17 0.97 |
18 0.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6p(3) |
|
11 2.23 |
12 1.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2s(3) |
|
5 1.17 |
6 0.91 |
7 0.75 |
8 0.65 |
9 0.57 |
10 0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6p(2) |
|
3 2.05 |
4 1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2s(2) |
|
1 0.79 |
2 0.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2s(1) |
TABLE 6. AVERAGES OF SUBLEVELS COMPRESSION
|
Nunbers |
Sublevel |
Order |
Radius |
Compression
|
/Steps |
Average step |
|
1-2 |
2 |
(1) |
0,79- 0,49 |
0,30 |
/2 |
0,15 |
|
3-4 |
2 |
(2) |
2,05 -1,40 |
0,65 |
/2 |
0,325 |
|
11-12 |
2 |
(4) |
2,23- 1,72 |
0,51 |
/2 |
0,255 |
|
19-20 |
2 |
(6) |
2,77- 2,23 |
0,54 |
/2 |
0,27 |
|
37-38 |
2 |
(9) |
2,98 -2,45 |
0,53 |
/2 |
0,265 |
|
55-56 |
2 |
(12) |
3,34- 2,78 |
0,56 |
/2 |
0,28 |
|
87-88 |
2 |
(16) |
2,70- 2,33 |
0,37 |
/2 |
0,185 |
|
Average general of
5 with octets |
|
|
|
0,558 |
/2 |
0,279 |
|
Average general of 2 without octets
|
|
|
|
0,335
|
/2
|
0,167 .............. |
|
5-10 |
6 |
(3) |
1,17- 0,51 |
0,66 |
/6 |
0,11 |
|
13-18 |
6 |
(5) |
1,82- 0,88 |
0,94 |
/6 |
0,157 |
|
31-36 |
6 |
(8) |
1,81- 1,03 |
0,78 |
/6 |
0,13 |
|
49-54 |
6 |
(11) |
2,00- 1,24 |
0,76 |
/6 |
0,127 |
|
81-86 |
6 |
(15) |
2,08- 1,34 |
0,74 |
/6 |
0,123 |
|
Average general of 6
|
|
|
|
0,776
|
/6
|
0,1293 .............. |
|
21-30 |
10 |
(7) |
2,09- 1,53 |
0,56 |
/10 |
0,056 |
|
39-48 |
10 |
(10) |
2,27- 1,71 |
0,56 |
/10 |
0,056 |
|
71-80 |
10 |
(14) |
2,25- 1,76 |
0,49 |
/10 |
0,049 |
|
Average general of 10 |
|
|
|
0,537
|
/10
|
0,0537 ............. |
|
57-70 Average general of 14 |
14
|
(13)
|
2,74- 2,40
|
0,34
|
/14
|
0,0242 ............. |
|
Average of 2 without octets. |
0,165 |
|
Average of 2 with octets. |
0,279 |
|
Average of 6 electrons |
0,129 |
|
Average of 10 electrons |
0,0537 |
|
Average of 14 electrons |
0,0242 |
TABLE 7. STRUCTURE OF AVERAGES OF A SUPPOSED
ATOM IN SYMMETRICAL LEVELS
|
Número |
Level |
Sublevel |
Order |
Radius |
Compression |
Step |
Averages |
|
87-88 |
7 |
2s |
(16) |
2,70- 2,37 |
0,33 |
/2 |
0,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81-86 |
6 |
6p |
(15) |
2,08- 1,30 |
0,776 |
/6 |
0,129 |
|
55-56 |
6 |
2s |
(12) |
3,34- 2,78 |
0,558 |
/2 |
0,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71-80 |
5 |
10d |
(14) |
2,25 1,71 |
0,537 |
/10 |
0,0537 |
|
49-54 |
5 |
6p |
(11) |
2,00- 1,22 |
0,776 |
/6 |
0,129 |
|
37-38 |
5 |
2s |
(9) |
2,98 -2,42 |
0,558 |
/2 |
0,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57-70 |
4 |
|
(13) |
2,74- 2,40 |
0,34 |
/14 |
0,0242 |
|
39-48 |
4 |
10d |
(10) |
2,27- 1,73 |
0,537 |
/10 |
0,0537 |
|
31-36 |
4 |
6p |
(8) |
1,81- 1,03 |
0,776 |
/6 |
0,129 |
|
19-20 |
4 |
2s |
(6) |
2,77- 2,21 |
0,558 |
/2 |
0,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21-30 |
3 |
10d |
(7) |
2,09- 1,55 |
0,537 |
/10 |
0,0537 |
|
13-18 |
3 |
6p |
(5) |
1,66- 0,88 |
0,776 |
/6 |
0,129 |
|
11-12 |
3 |
2s |
(4) |
2,23- 1,67 |
0,558 |
/2 |
0,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-10 |
2 |
6p |
(3) |
1,27- 0,51 |
0,776 |
/6 |
0,129 |
|
3-4 |
2 |
2s |
(2) |
2,05 -1,49 |
0,558 |
/2 |
0,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-2 |
1 |
2s |
(1) |
0,79- 0,46 |
0,33 |
/2 |
0,165 |
____________________
Bibliography is not made of those authors and extensive knowledge of
easy
consultation for the Internet. If this doesn't, we contribute
with enough
data for their confirmation. The appreciable
differences
among different authors, in the figures that express the tables, like
planetary
distances or atomic radios don't alter the foreseen objective.
It would be very convenient to discover objections.
It will continue. Next amplification.