(Please forgive
my faulty English)
It is said than the distinction
between the body and the mind or the spirit, is one
of the
central problems in the history of the religion and philosophy. The
explanation
of the relation concerns existing between them, to the Cartesian
impasse. It
was "the world knot" for Schopenhauer.
With the extensive knowledge updated of the
functioning of the brain, it seems that the mind is understood as a biological evolution. With physical root.
Though some important
scientists support that the mind is fundamentally different.
Only I know a book, which you will have to
judge. It is supposedly extracted from the deepest of the mind, in the
year
1851/52. Here it seems to affirm the existence of the universe, of the
humanity, owed a law that is some fundamental physics in the year 2008.
I believe that we all owe to him much to
Google. This work, this one achieved thanks to "Google Books Library
Project "– An enhanced card catalog of the
world's books.
I am an author with few readers on
slightly bitter physics. My work prevents me from recreating me. I look
for
answers hurriedly.
This has
been across: "World's books of Googles
Library
Project". I have
found the sensation of the incredible thing for the first time in my
long life.
Google served me the following
among
other answers one day in a consultation.
THE MACROCOSM AND MICROCOSM, Or, The Universe Without and the...
- Resultado de
“But although the Universal System and the Solar System thus each
consists of a complete octave of developments, each octave has its own
particular key-note,...”
books.google.es/books?id=_KMAAAAAMAAJ...
It seemed to refer to a scientific
book with very advanced pretensions for their time. It is strange that
someone
was writing on the Microcosm in 1852. Then only atomic theory the
matter of
The included comment was some
ridicule
towards part of my work of 2008 seemed, for my surprise.
When extending the cover encounter:
MACROCOSM AND MICROCOSM;
OR THE
UNIVERSE WITHOUT AND THE UNIVERSE WITHIN:
being
UNFOLDING/DESPLIEGUE OF THE PLAN OF CREATION AND THE CORRESPONDENCE
OF TRUTHS, BOTH IN -
THE WORLD OF SENSE AND THE WORLD OF SOUL.
BY WILLIAM FISHBOUGH.
THE MACROCOSM; OR, THE UNIVERSE WITHOUT.
Nature is a harp of SEVEN TIMES SEVEN strings, On
which, by God's own hand, is gently played
The ever-varied music of the spheres
FOWLERS AND WELLS, PUBLISHERS,
CLINTON HALL, 131
(Cuño)To
Astor, Lenox and Tilden Foundation R.
1924 L
The MICROCOSM, he seemed to be
clarified by "THE WORLD OF SOUL". He clarifies more in the Page 4:
“ my
proposed anthropological Treatise by a general disquisition upon the
realm of
exterior being, -which I have called the " MACROCOSM," in
contradistinction to the human physical and psychical constitution,
which I
have called the "MICROCOSM."”
On having turned the pages of the
text
I was looking alike occupied in a supposed relation with a religion.
This is not of my work, for which I
understand that the physical laws appear insistently. They are fixed
and
verifiable as real laws of the nature. Therefore, true laws of the
creation or
if you wish true law of the creator. It is as like it the majority of
scientists
deal. Thus it is Imhotep, Pitagoras,
Kepler, Einstein, Hawking or an
interminable list of
others, less distinguished. They are not fitted by a religion that
differs or
has to interpret to the science. Science is interpreted to itself.
I feared to be using some precious
seconds. However, use Google, I decided to extract by curiosity,
that concepts accompany to some key words.
Then,
some answers
appear for me inexplicable. I have had the sensation of being faced
with a few
strange affirmations.
The author had had to acquire knowledge with some extension to
describe
contents of last discoveries of the cosmology of his time.
The later reading confirmed my
suspicions. Nevertheless, in the same page IV some kind of inexplicable
thing
was appearing:
”This discovery, which I have called ``the law of the seven-fold correspondential series, or the harmonial
scale of creation´´, is, to some extent, unfolded and
applied in the present
volume”
I understand that the author, on behalf of the physics, tells us
that he
will dedicate this volume to explain his great discovery to us.
For me to affirm "the law of the seven-fold correspondential
series," with "the harmonial scale of
creation," He was to surrender to the ridiculous one, the
discredit,
defying the measurable reality. Neither is news of this law in any
religious
book. It would be so not his discovery.
For more surprise in the same page
he
adds:
“might prove to be in some good
degree supplied by a discovery, the fundamental principles of which
came
into my mind some four years ago, in a manner quite extraordinary,
but of
which I need not now speak particularly”
He insists on the Page V
“This idea, with its natural adjuncts, of which I can not here
speak particularly, by harmonizing and unitizing all natural series
and
degrees of creation, ...”
An impression was arising from
that, we might be with an obsessive one, which was in addition
concealing
something.
Having mentioned " the nature is
a harp of SEVEN TIMES' SEVEN or, “sevenfold series" this suggests to
us that the author can be accustomed to sitting down before a harp or
an organ.
Even so these do not contain physical law including in a "harmonic
scale
of creation". Be clear that nobody might understand, less explaining.
Joined to "The music of the spheres", it takes us to a succession of
seven octaves of the diatonic musical scale. Seven notes for octave,
related to
proportions of entire numbers, in time of Pithagoras.
Then there were seven divine known bodies around the Sun.
This
idea
arrived until Kepler by reverence to
mathematical
cosmology.
Today we know that it is not
possible
to speak harmonics if we did not add of what fundamental frequency, of
what
length limit depends. If we refer to the Solar System for being the
origin of
its relation with the music of the spheres, we have to put a limit to
the Solar
System.
On the other hand, for the “unitizing all-natural series and
degrees of creation”, it is to oblige to agree geometric
contradictions. This needs distances' or degrees' uniform for his law.
The
seven notes do not have uniform distances. Whereas the octaves need to
do
uniformity of distances of doubles or halves. A real uniformity has to
be
obtained of the repetition of same note in equal times or elevating
notes in
uniform degrees.
Curiously the physics of the human
ear
perceives regular intervals in the double frequencies of the octaves.
The author shows to know a
similarity
with octaves when he mentions the law of Titius-Bode
in the page 28 including to the asteroids instead of a planet.
“There is a similar relation between the distances of the different
planets; for, proceeding outward from Mercury, each successive planet
(including the asteroids as equivalent to one planet) is about double
the
distance of the previous planet from the sun.”
The law consists of the adoption of a scale of
double
distance. It is applied in the shape of 0, 3, 6, 12, etc. To that there
will be
necessary to add 4 to observe coincidences with the planetary
distances. These
are given in 1/10 astronomical unit.
But these double distances are not fulfilled rigorously. There are
hollows
without real planets. Later with the discovery of
The author is not known, for any
other
writing, or scientific linking. Despite his lack of this profession it
appears
clear when he declares to be writer in Page 25
“To the writer it is not a little surprising that this form of
planetary bodies has not, of itself, established among astronomers the
universal conviction.”
Practically, along the book the
description navigates in imprecise form.
I return to feel the sensation of
leaving
the book.
But the incredible thing appears in
the Page 245.
It is the only image of the book.
We understand that finally he
presents
a concrete form, to coinciding with the already said of so vague form
on 245
pages on circles, Degrees and correspondences.
The figure is a spiral. A spiral done for
circles?
It is clear that he claims a growth and
a simultaneous uniformity. It is extended in seven turns - circles
separated by
a uniform distance, exempting the initial part, where its tiny origin
cannot
represent the uniform distance.
This way expresses it in Page
248
“The diagram, also, by presenting a succession of continually
expanding circles, all having one center,
and being
constituted after one principle,...”
In the page 205 he had anticipated
us:
“In view of the circular constitution and order of procession of
each
system of being, we are prepared to further remark, that Degrees of
altitude of
each of these kinds, result from a spiral uprising, so to speak, of the
circle of
development, by which the first Elemental Degree ascends to the
altitude of the
second, the second to the third, and so on; or by which the first
Discreet
Degree progressively rises to the altitude of the second, and the
second to the
third, and by which one whole circle of developments, in being
completed, thus
forming a Complete Degree, passes out into another and higher circle or
Complete Degree.”
But this figure forms a base that
is
interrupted. An external line descends, forming an angle with a
vertical axis
being reflected symmetrically in the centre towards the opposite part.
At the
same time, forming in angles' inside other seven, symmetrical to the
same axis,
descends the ray of lines on the uniform successive distances'.
Similar
adjustment
to the conditions of crystallization of Bragg.
The author describes it in page 245
“one angle being within another which descends from the upper part
of
the diagram, and whose most exterior angle comes to a point at the center ^ of the diagram, represent a seven-fold
Ray or
Glory emanating from the Divine Being.”
But the amplification of the spiral
with uniform distances cannot represent seven unequal fractions of an
octave.
Its regularity, single can represent the degrees of intervals,
equivalent to
the double lengths of octaves. Therefore, it must be developed
correctly and be
understood.
My surprise, with geometric logical
requirements for the same concept, the same figure of the year 1852, is
representing the mine described the year ¡2008!
See our image in the net
http://perso.wanadoo.es/solarsystem137.html
Fig. 15 Fine structure
differences.
We are
the defendants of to advance coincidence series of seven integers of
the fine
structure, with series that repeat one inside another. Being the fine
structure, the space occupied limits of the different scales of energy
in the
whole universe.
Some
applied singing of incomprehensible form in the book.
***
Fishbough mentions of the atoms in Page 66
“as
many degrees, varieties, or perhaps classes of atomic particles, as
corresponded to the general seven-fold harmonies of his own Infinite
nature.
...”
“The
supposition that the varieties of these primitive atoms are, in number,
just
seven, or a multiple of seven, is admitted to be purely a priori, but
is a
legitimate deduction from principles before established: it is here
offered as
an introduction to propositions more certain,”
“Now,
supposing that there were originally just seven kinds or classes of
atomic
particles (no matter into how many more kinds or classes these were ...”
“Let the
central point in the diagram, then, represent the atomic or lowest
stage of
creation, this being the physical Germ from which the great Tree of...”
Nevertheless, Mendelejeff's first
works dates
back of 1860.
According to the objective science claimed by our part, the
characteristics of spiral forces an extension by each circles. A radius
that is
to born in the centre, the successive points would cross in 1, 2, 3, 4
etc.
For configuration spaces with the account of spins, it is equal
to 2n2
= 2, 8, 18, 32 etc.
Linked directly to the atomic capacity.
If you want to spread in this, to look at
our imperfect works describing the atom, in
http://perso.wanadoo.es/30127/quantumenigma.htm
http://perso.wanadoo.es/30127/Welookforsolutiontoproblem.html
***
After this, I looked for possible specifics of the author or
give the
origin of the book.
Fortunately some of my suspicions were satisfied although
apparently
they are opened on a new abyss.
William Fishbough appears pointed
out by
Arthur Conan Doyle, in its Histoira of the
Spiritism, as amanuensis of Andrés
Jackson Davis.
According to Arthur Conan Doyle, Andrés
Jackson Davis was one of the most remarkable men of whom we have any
exact
record.
The network offers-diverse information on its life, we have
chosen the
following ones:
Andrew Jackson Davis grew up in poverty. He was born at Blooming
Grove,
a small hamlet along the Hudson River, in
His father was an alcoholic, instigation the mother was reduced
to
wretchedness and beggary.
Her mother was illiterate, but rigidly religious, others add
clairvoyant.
He was a mama’s boy, failing miserably at his father’s craft
and other manly pursuits.
Thus, its life passed with the elementary shortage, surrounded
by the
affection of its mother, who stimulated her mind, with its confidence
in its
superior future qualities.
But,
his mother died when he was still a boy.
According to Arthur Conan Doyle, as a boy,
When his mother died, he had a vision of a lovely home in a
bright land.
He assumed it was where his mother had gone (Doyle I 43).
However with the 12 years,
In
With
Later helped with local tailor called Guillermo Levingston
induces
He
consented, and the experiment proved a startling success and found that
in this
altered state of consciousness.
Under mesmeric influence, the boy
revealed
clairvoyant power to a remarkable degree.
In
October of 1895, Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen
of the
Physical Institute of the
We
continue with description of Arthur Conan Doyle:
The
History of Spiritualism Vol I Page 15
THE PROPHET OF THE NEW REVELATION. ANDREW JACKSON
DAVIS was
one of the most remarkable men of whom we have any exact record.
Page 16
He
felt higher powers stirring within him, and it was remarked to him that
when he
was asked profound questions in the mesmeric
trance
he always replied, "I will answer that in my book."
In his
nineteenth year he felt that the hour for writing the book had come.
The mesmeric influence of Levingston
did not, for some reason, seem suited for this, and a Dr. Lyon was
chosen as
the new mesmerist.
Page 17
Lyon
threw up his practice and went with his singular protege
to
The
intuitional selection seems to have been justified, for he also at once
gave up
his work and obeyed the summons
Then, the apparatus being ready,
They were reaching out to the beyond, and what can man do that
is nobler?
Dr.
George Bush, Professor of Hebrew in the
I can
solemnly affirm that I have heard Davis correctly quote the Hebrew
language in
his lectures, and display a knowledge of geology which would have been
astonishing in a person of his age, even if he had devoted years to the
study
"The circumference of his head is
unusually small," says he
"If
size is the measure of power, then this youth's mental capacity is
unusually
limited
His lungs are weak and unexpanded
He has not read a book save one
According with the description of Arthur Conan Doyle
During
these hypnotic episodes, some material wealth arrived, everything which
was
transcribed by Reverendo Fishbough.
It is very well to talk of the subconscious mind, but this has usually
been
taken as the appearance of ideas which have been received and then
submerged.
Neither claims nor complaints we know done by
We have not found a decisive graph in the books
that
Example:
A
stellar key to the summer land by Andrew Jackson Davis, author of
"Nature's divine revelations" third thousand
***
Incredible?
I want
to see this of a rational form.
But,
does a directed intuition exist?
The
brain automatically, without bothering, it does in scientific very
complicated
mathematical operations: When we reach a sidewalk, we avoid a blow or
we
stopped a ball.
Others' walk speaking alone, or thinking deeply, leaving the
view in the
background and another part of the brain it takes charge constructing
its steps.
Psychiatrists know about amnesia, deliriums, catalepsy, sleep
walking
and dreams of fever that affects the brain.
The
origin of the common sense that accompanies origin of the use of reason.
I have
a work, not published with notions of possible relations of uses of
reason with
sense of the intuition.
The
cerebral bark is said than it is a structure inside the brain that
plays a key
part in the thought and the conscience (wikipedia
and
others).
Saying
of very simple form, the cerebral crust is the box of resonance where
the
faculties of the brain in animals and humans are pronounced.
Though
the more developed powers in the human beings are observed
across certain differences in the neocortex.
Both,
resonances' boxes, the cerebral cortex and the new cortex with the same
central
set in the roll-of great coordinator of the senses.
The diencephalon or the thalamus and the
hypothalamus, they are
capable of consulting with the different memories with speed of
dizziness and
of deciding an identical result (resonant). There exist forms of
typical waves
for the arterial tension, for the ear, hearing, or to detect changes hippocampal electrophysiology. Etc.
I believe in the scientific possibility of cerebral resonances.
To catch resonances of brains of the past, it is something that
escapes
from me.
Cerebral resonances do future give?
But if the facts exist, we will have to wait for an explanation.
